H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs John Bartlett H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Cano holds a 1–0 lead over John Bartlett in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1976 Tehran second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 78
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1976* | Tehran | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | (w/o) | John Bartlett | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Bartlett | #400 | #93 | 0 | 1,507 | 45 | 108 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | John Bartlett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #118 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #210 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #175 | 1,367 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #221 | 1,332 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #268 | 1,324 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #400 | 1,337 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |