Ricardo Cano
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Vilas | 0 | 9 | 9 | Nov 19, 1981 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 22, 1983 | H2H |
| Paolo Bertolucci | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 21, 1980 | H2H |
| Ivan Molina | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 8, 1979 | H2H |
| Zeljko Franulovic | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jul 20, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs Jose Luis Damiani H2H: 0-1
Jose Luis Damiani holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Luis Damiani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Luis Damiani won the 1981 North Conway round of 32 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Luis Damiani | 6-4 6-1 | Ricardo Cano | Match data | Jul 31, 1981* | R32 | North Conway | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #42 | 0 | 1,797 | 140 | 145 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jose Luis Damiani | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,781 | 50 | 64 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #148 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #92 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #169 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 38 | 23 | 61 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 12 | 17 | 29 | 41.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 1977 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 29 | 22 | 51 | 56.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 128 | 129 | 257 | 49.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 46 | 50 | 96 | 47.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1970 | 1494 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.67 | — | — | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 1490 | 105.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 1477 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 30.0% | -1.45 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.44 | 1978 | 1580 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | 50.0% | -0.11 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1490 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | 1979 | 1512 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +22 | — | 26.3% | -1.55 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.22 |
| 23 | 1974 | 1504 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.69 | 1980 | 1612 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | 51.5% | -0.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 24 | 1975 | 1739 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | 51.9% | +0.06 | 7–3 (70%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.44 | 1981 | 1731 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | 55.0% | +0.32 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | -1.33 |
| 25 | 1976 | 1732 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | -109 | +26 | — | 56.2% | +0.47 | 14–8 (64%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +6.25 | 1982 | 1637 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -123 | +23 | — | 39.5% | -0.80 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +0.04 |
| 26 | 1977 | 1674 | 138.6 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +10 | — | 43.4% | -0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -1.77 | 1983 | 1592 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | — | — | — | +0.59 |
| 27 | 1978 | 1632 | 125.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 44.6% | -0.20 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 1567 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | — | -5 | — | 36.1% | -0.89 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 1543 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | 37.0% | -0.63 | 1–4 (20%) | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 1717 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +17 | — | 54.5% | +0.30 | 11–4 (73%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | +1.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1982 | 1608 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +43 | — | 26.5% | -1.82 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 1581 | 107.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | 46.4% | -0.50 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.87 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1797 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +21 | — | 47.7% | -0.16 | 51–43 (54%) | 33–30 (52%) | 106.0 | +3.30 | — | 1781 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | -68 | +29 | — | 44.2% | -0.45 | 12–15 (44%) | 11–15 (42%) | 95.0 | -0.47 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jose Luis Damiani
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 23, 1982 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 19, 1982 | H2H |
| Jose Higueras | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 19, 1982 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 22, 1982 | H2H |
| Paolo Bertolucci | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 20, 1982 | H2H |