H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs Jun Kuki H2H: 1-1
Ricardo Cano and Jun Kuki are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jun Kuki leads 1–0 on clay, while Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1977 San Jose third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1977* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ricardo Cano | 6-3 6-3 | Jun Kuki | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1976* | Palma | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jun Kuki | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun Kuki | #523 | #74 | 0 | 1,662 | 73 | 134 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Jun Kuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #217 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #101 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–28 | 28.2% | #161 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #201 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #146 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #389 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #356 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |