H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 1-0
Ricardo Cano holds a 1–0 lead over Nikola Pilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1977 Nice third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1977* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ricardo Cano | 6-4 7-5 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |