H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Ricardo Cano vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Zednik holds a 1–0 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Zednik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Vladimir Zednik won the 1978 Nice third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1978* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Vladimir Zednik | 7-5 6-4 | Ricardo Cano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Cano | #768 | #41 | 0 | 1,792 | 142 | 147 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ricardo Cano | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #42 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #51 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #169 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #73 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #62 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1982 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #91 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |