H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Richard Bloomfield vs Tomas Zib

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Richard Bloomfield vs Tomas Zib.

GBR Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #139 7-6(6) 7-5 Richard Bloomfield #225 Match data Aug 28, 2006 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Bloomfield #1,850 #176 244 1,616 4 12 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Bloomfield Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #457 1,483 0 0
21 2004 0–1 0.0% #374 1,475 0 0
22 2005 0–1 0.0% #290 1,468 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 2006 1–2 33.3% #214 1,447 0 0 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 2007 0–3 0.0% #303 1,409 0 0 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2008 0–1 0.0% #297 1,494 0 0 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2009 0–1 0.0% #469 1,523 0 0
27 2010 3–1 75.0% #358 1,595 0 0 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2011 0–1 0.0% #483 1,566 0 0 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Bloomfield Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2009 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2010 3 1 4 75.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 2 2 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 16/16 of Richard Bloomfield's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Bloomfield Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 1/1 12.0 3.0 53.9% 72.7% 51.1% 62.5% 25.0% 62.7% 26.3% —/—
21 2004 1/1 10.0 8.0 65.7% 72.3% 41.2% 63.6% 61.6% 16.7% —/—
22 2005 1/1 13.0 6.0 53.4% 80.9% 51.2% 50.0% 33.3% 67.0% 23.3% —/—
23 2006 3/3 15.0 4.7 58.4% 80.0% 48.4% 90.1% 47.6% 67.8% 30.4% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 2007 3/3 5.0 2.0 50.6% 70.8% 36.5% 33.5% 66.7% 52.4% 21.9% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2008 1/1 8.0 9.0 59.3% 68.8% 60.6% 83.3% 65.4% 23.4% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2009 1/1 14.0 1.0 58.9% 88.4% 56.7% 0.0% 75.3% 22.1% —/—
27 2010 4/4 9.8 4.3 58.2% 78.3% 60.0% 69.4% 45.6% 70.3% 31.2% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2011 1/1 7.0 10.0 35.0% 66.7% 38.5% 54.5% 100.0% 48.3% 23.7% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 —/— 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 —/— 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 —/— 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 —/— 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
Career 16/16 10.2 4.6 55.4% 76.0% 49.6% 60.2% 42.7% 63.9% 26.1% 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Bloomfield Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2003 1484 97.6 -2.41 +0.55 0.706 45.2% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.07
21 2004 1476 99.7 -4.02 +0.97 0.434 42.7% 0.0% -2.67 -0.09
22 2005 1468 104.4 -0.07 -2.32 0.706 45.4% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 -0.03 1998 1488 +0.05
23 2006 1447 103.8 +0.90 -1.74 0.946 51.3% +60 44.4% +0.55 0–1 0–1 +0.40 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) +0.15
24 2007 1410 100.6 -0.85 -3.62 0.460 38.7% +43 0.0% -3.28 -0.19 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) +0.93
25 2008 1494 110.1 +0.29 +1.16 0.678 46.9% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.19 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) +0.84
26 2009 1524 105.3 -1.36 -1.78 0.895 48.0% 0.0% -1.00 0–2 -0.06 2002 1446 99.2
27 2010 1595 105.0 +1.30 -1.60 1.051 51.1% +69 66.7% +0.67 1–0 3–1 (75%) +0.45 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 21.4% -2.14 2–1 (67%) -0.14
28 2011 1566 97.7 -1.05 -1.70 0.458 38.8% 0.0% -4.00 +0.02 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) -0.23
29 2012 1519 95.6 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) +0.40
30 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) -0.86
31 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) -0.21
32 2015 1500 97.7 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 +0.06
33 2009 1544 102.6
Career 1617 105.4 -0.20 -1.60 0.722 46.3% +59 27.5% -1.07 1–2 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 96.9 +2.38 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.