H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 4-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2016 Wimbledon third round 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 3, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #318 2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #399 Match data
Mar 26, 2016* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-4 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #50 Match data
May 5, 2012* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay Richard Gasquet #18 2-6 7-6(1) 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #42 Match data
Mar 26, 2012* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #17 6-2 5-7 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #56 Match data
Mar 11, 2012* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Albert Ramos-Vinolas #57 3-6 7-5 6-1 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16