H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs Andy Murray H2H: 5-10
Andy Murray holds a 10–5 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Andy Murray leads 5–4 on hard courts and 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2021 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
10
15 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2021* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2019* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-4 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Andy Murray | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-0 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 7, 2015* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Andy Murray | 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2015* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Andy Murray | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andy Murray | (w/o) | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Mar 30, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Andy Murray | 1-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 18, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Richard Gasquet | 6-7(1) 6-3 6-2 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Andy Murray | 7-6(3) 6-3 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andy Murray | 4-6 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2009* | Dubai | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | (w/o) | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Andy Murray | 5-7 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2007* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2006* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 7-5 | Andy Murray | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Gasquet | Andy Murray | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 |
| 26 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 |
| 27 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 |
| 29 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 |
| 31 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 |
| 32 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 |
| 33 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 |
| 34 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 |
| 35 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 |
| 36 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 |
| 37 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 |
| 38 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |