H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Andy Roddick H2H: 2-3

Andy Roddick holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2011 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Andy Roddick
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 17, 2011* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #21 6-3 7-6(5) Andy Roddick #8 Match data
Jan 9, 2010* Brisbane ATP 250 QF Hard Andy Roddick #7 6-3 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #52 Match data
Jul 5, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Richard Gasquet #14 4-6 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) 8-6 Andy Roddick #3 Match data
Mar 13, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #3 7-6(3) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data
Oct 13, 2006* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Andy Roddick #6 6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 Richard Gasquet #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,177 577 196 74.6% 1 5 0 4 22 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,855 0 3
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,923 0 5
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,092 1 11
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2004 66–15 81.5% #2 2,078 1 15
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,031 1 20
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 1,998 1 21
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,008 1 26
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,046 1 27
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,988 1 29
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,024 1 30
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2012 22–12 64.7% #39 1,987 1 32
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —