H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Andy Roddick H2H: 2-3

Andy Roddick holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2011 Indian Wells Open fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Andy Roddick
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #21 6-3 7-6(5) Andy Roddick #8 Match data Mar 17, 2011* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andy Roddick #7 6-3 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #52 Match data Jan 9, 2010* QF Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #14 4-6 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(3) 8-6 Andy Roddick #3 Match data Jul 5, 2007* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Andy Roddick #3 7-6(3) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data Mar 13, 2007* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andy Roddick #6 6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 Richard Gasquet #28 Match data Oct 13, 2006* R16 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,175 580 198 74.6% 1 5 0 5 21 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,854 0 3
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,922 0 5
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,091 1 11
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2004 68–16 81.0% #2 2,068 1 15
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,036 1 20
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 2,008 1 21
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,007 1 26
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,045 1 27
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,990 1 29
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,025 1 30
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2012 23–13 63.9% #39 1,990 1 32
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Andy Roddick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 20 10 30 66.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2002 32 11 43 74.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 44 10 54 81.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 51 11 62 82.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 29 9 38 76.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 36 11 47 76.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2008 38 12 50 76.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 33 11 44 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 42 15 57 73.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 27 11 38 71.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 407 137 544 74.8% 67 29 96 69.8% 83 22 105 79.0% 23 10 33 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 752/778 of Andy Roddick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Andy Roddick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% 2000 7/9 7.4 2.1 56.8% 76.4% 57.4% 61.0% 37.5% 68.5% 33.1%
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 2001 50/55 10.4 3.6 58.9% 80.0% 57.0% 66.5% 37.5% 70.3% 37.0%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2002 62/70 9.0 2.6 61.4% 79.8% 54.3% 64.2% 43.5% 70.0% 37.3%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2003 87/89 11.1 2.1 61.8% 80.6% 58.7% 63.1% 44.2% 72.2% 37.3%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2004 81/84 12.6 2.3 63.6% 81.2% 56.9% 69.8% 42.3% 72.3% 38.0%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2005 69/70 13.2 1.9 65.7% 82.6% 58.1% 70.6% 44.9% 74.1% 36.7%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2006 62/63 11.4 1.5 66.8% 79.9% 56.0% 70.1% 46.0% 71.9% 38.3%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2007 64/64 11.7 1.5 64.3% 80.8% 57.2% 65.2% 42.0% 72.4% 34.1%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2008 62/63 14.3 2.1 67.2% 78.4% 56.0% 65.8% 39.5% 71.1% 36.0%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2009 61/62 12.5 1.4 69.8% 79.4% 58.6% 61.6% 40.3% 73.0% 36.4%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2010 66/66 12.3 1.5 68.7% 79.6% 59.2% 67.2% 37.4% 73.0% 35.2%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2011 47/47 12.1 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 56.5% 62.5% 44.0% 69.7% 36.3%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2012 34/36 10.1 1.9 66.4% 75.8% 56.1% 64.8% 37.1% 69.2% 35.1%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 752/778 11.8 2.0 64.8% 79.8% 57.2% 66.1% 41.8% 71.8% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Andy Roddick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 2000 1562 130.0 +2.92 -1.89 1.051 50.8% +7 — — 42.9% -0.29 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.45
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 2001 1854 151.7 +6.98 -0.04 1.246 53.2% -50 -84 -182 70.6% +1.13 7–8 (47%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.34
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 2002 1922 150.3 +6.65 +0.05 1.243 53.3% -11 -76 -241 67.9% +1.02 11–3 (79%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.39
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 2003 2091 158.5 +9.31 +1.00 1.343 54.4% -9 -246 -131 73.2% +1.35 17–5 (77%) 35–20 (64%) — -0.15
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 2004 2068 162.3 +8.68 +2.20 1.370 54.4% +33 -249 +34 76.8% +1.43 11–6 (65%) 35–10 (78%) — -0.37
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2005 2037 158.9 +9.75 +0.54 1.415 54.5% +35 -205 +243 73.3% +1.41 15–6 (71%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.17
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2006 2009 154.0 +8.35 +1.30 1.362 54.5% +43 -198 +195 70.4% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 16–17 (48%) — +3.03
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2007 2010 157.9 +8.22 -1.05 1.237 53.0% +51 -248 +218 70.9% +1.07 7–2 (78%) 29–12 (71%) — +1.00
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2008 2007 161.4 +7.15 +0.61 1.248 53.2% +42 -189 +148 69.0% +1.19 14–7 (67%) 23–17 (58%) — +0.50
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2009 2045 166.9 +8.85 +1.67 1.350 54.2% +9 -178 +250 72.2% +1.21 8–7 (53%) 32–11 (74%) — -0.24
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2010 1991 164.1 +8.60 +0.23 1.305 53.4% +45 -129 +236 67.5% +0.97 11–7 (61%) 23–17 (58%) — +2.84
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2011 2025 162.2 +5.97 +0.87 1.200 52.6% +41 — +182 63.9% +0.83 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.24
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2012 1991 148.1 +4.71 -0.49 1.139 52.1% +25 — +178 60.7% +0.44 7–3 (70%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.02
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2176 164.1 +7.98 +0.64 1.296 53.7% +22 -172 +108 70.1% +1.15 127–64 (66%) 280–166 (63%) 109.2 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.