H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 2-3

Arnaud Clement holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2011 Zagreb round of 16 W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #30 (w/o) Arnaud Clement #116 Match data Feb 4, 2011* R16 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Arnaud Clement #38 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #12 Match data Jun 23, 2007* QF Eastbourne Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #24 6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 Arnaud Clement #50 Match data Oct 28, 2006* SF Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Arnaud Clement #54 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 7-5 Richard Gasquet #26 Match data Oct 6, 2006* R16 Metz ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Arnaud Clement #65 3-6 6-4 6-0 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data Feb 16, 2006* R32 Marseille ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Arnaud Clement
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Arnaud Clement
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Arnaud Clement
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Arnaud Clement
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.