H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 2-3

Arnaud Clement holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2011 Zagreb fourth round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 2011* Zagreb ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #30 (w/o) Arnaud Clement #116 Match data
Jun 23, 2007* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Arnaud Clement #38 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #12 Match data
Oct 28, 2006* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Richard Gasquet #24 6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 Arnaud Clement #50 Match data
Oct 6, 2006* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Arnaud Clement #54 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 7-5 Richard Gasquet #26 Match data
Feb 16, 2006* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Arnaud Clement #65 3-6 6-4 6-0 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Arnaud Clement
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —