H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 2-0

Richard Gasquet holds a 2–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2010 Sydney International round of 16 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #53 6-2 7-6(4) Benjamin Becker #39 Match data Jan 15, 2010* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #18 6-3 6-4 Benjamin Becker #58 Match data Jan 12, 2007* R16 Sydney International International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Benjamin Becker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Benjamin Becker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0%
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0%
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Benjamin Becker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.