H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 5-0

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Estoril fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 2017* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #23 6-1 6-4 Carlos Berlocq #64 Match data
Jan 19, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #18 6-1 6-1 6-1 Carlos Berlocq #90 Match data
May 28, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #21 3-6 6-3 6-1 4-6 6-1 Carlos Berlocq #111 Match data
Jan 21, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Gasquet #28 6-1 6-3 6-1 Carlos Berlocq #70 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #13 7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 Carlos Berlocq #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 186 40.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,427 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,550 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,541 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,672 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2012 23–28 45.1% #66 1,670 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,829 0 1
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,728 0 2
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,686 0 2
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,728 0 2
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,693 0 2
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,665 0 2
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,504 0 2
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —