H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Carlos Moya H2H: 1-3

Carlos Moya holds a 3–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2010 Mexican Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Carlos Moya
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #54 4-6 6-3 6-2 Carlos Moya #439 Match data Feb 24, 2010* R32 Mexican Open ATP 500 Clay
Carlos Moya #61 6-2 6-4 Richard Gasquet #12 Match data Sep 13, 2008* SF Tiriac Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Carlos Moya #44 6-3 4-6 6-2 Richard Gasquet #18 Match data Jan 13, 2007* SF Sydney International International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Carlos Moya #7 3-6 6-3 6-2 Richard Gasquet #86 Match data Mar 5, 2004* R16 Mexican Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,029 554 310 64.1% 1 3 0 3 13 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,624 0 1
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,762 0 2
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,817 0 3
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,896 1 5
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,761 1 5
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,820 1 6
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,736 1 7
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,905 1 14
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2004 56–18 75.7% #5 1,894 1 17
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,801 1 18
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,758 1 19
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,659 1 20
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Carlos Moya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 35 16 51 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1997 25 11 36 69.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 28 7 35 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 12 11 23 52.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 22 12 34 64.7% 34 7 41 82.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2003 20 12 32 62.5% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 23 10 33 69.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 16 10 26 61.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 12 11 23 52.2% 18 11 29 62.1% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 17 12 29 58.6% 25 10 35 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2008 15 12 27 55.6% 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 212 144 356 59.6% 318 135 453 70.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 16 28 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 779/864 of Carlos Moya's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Carlos Moya
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 1995 17/18 1.7 1.1 66.9% 61.1% 56.3% 54.6% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 1996 63/70 3.0 1.9 65.7% 68.1% 51.1% 53.5% 48.7% 62.1% 41.5%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 1997 67/82 3.0 2.2 62.5% 67.9% 50.2% 56.8% 51.9% 60.9% 41.3%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 1998 55/68 5.1 2.4 55.4% 71.4% 51.6% 58.3% 43.3% 62.3% 41.0%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 1999 53/57 5.0 3.2 53.7% 69.9% 48.7% 58.0% 38.9% 60.0% 39.8%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2000 40/53 4.9 2.7 54.4% 73.7% 53.5% 62.4% 44.6% 64.5% 38.8%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2001 51/57 6.2 2.2 57.0% 74.0% 54.1% 58.8% 41.4% 65.4% 38.1%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2002 68/80 4.7 2.4 60.8% 74.9% 52.8% 60.0% 39.8% 66.2% 40.0%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2003 67/71 6.6 3.2 55.4% 75.6% 54.5% 64.5% 44.6% 66.1% 40.9%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2004 69/74 7.2 2.7 56.7% 76.9% 55.9% 63.6% 42.9% 67.7% 38.3%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2005 50/52 5.1 2.6 59.6% 73.3% 50.6% 61.5% 46.6% 64.0% 37.8%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2006 51/52 6.2 2.5 58.5% 73.3% 50.6% 63.5% 38.4% 63.9% 36.7%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2007 64/65 5.8 2.8 61.8% 73.2% 51.6% 61.5% 44.1% 64.7% 38.3%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2008 51/51 5.2 2.5 61.4% 70.5% 54.8% 56.2% 38.8% 64.5% 34.9%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2009 6/6 5.2 4.5 54.2% 73.0% 51.5% 53.2% 38.4% 62.7% 32.6%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2010 7/8 3.6 2.1 58.8% 65.0% 47.9% 46.0% 47.9% 58.1% 32.2%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 779/864 5.1 2.5 59.0% 72.2% 52.4% 59.6% 43.6% 63.9% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Carlos Moya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 1995 1625 122.9 -0.16 +0.33 1.013 50.2% — +58 — 56.1% +0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.6 +1.02
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 1996 1762 150.4 +1.08 +3.10 1.096 51.9% -150 +75 — 56.1% +0.59 11–8 (58%) 15–13 (54%) 104.9 -0.34
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 1997 1817 155.8 -0.08 +3.21 1.056 51.1% +14 +60 -246 57.5% +0.55 21–8 (72%) 12–21 (36%) 100.3 -1.62
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 1998 1897 158.7 +0.95 +3.17 1.087 51.5% -44 +172 -324 62.1% +0.58 12–7 (63%) 18–8 (69%) 107.9 -2.63
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 1999 1762 141.1 -1.24 +1.76 0.996 49.8% +2 +190 -151 59.5% +0.37 13–9 (59%) 12–11 (52%) 95.6 +1.37
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 2000 1820 146.0 +2.45 +1.57 1.095 51.8% +9 +49 -274 60.0% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 15–11 (58%) 94.4 -3.30
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 2001 1736 146.1 +2.90 +0.43 1.100 51.5% +41 +139 -186 58.2% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.6 +1.01
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2002 1971 156.2 +4.12 +2.41 1.185 52.6% -42 +39 — 66.0% +0.89 19–7 (73%) 25–11 (69%) 113.0 -1.10
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2003 1905 153.0 +3.88 +3.65 1.207 53.2% -13 +88 — 66.7% +1.04 13–11 (54%) 17–17 (50%) 91.6 +1.32
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2004 1895 151.7 +4.66 +1.24 1.186 52.7% -31 +163 -252 67.7% +0.94 18–6 (75%) 20–9 (69%) 109.4 +1.49
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2005 1802 145.3 +1.89 +0.56 1.050 50.9% +2 +153 — 57.6% +0.36 9–9 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 94.4 +0.86
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2006 1759 140.5 +2.22 -0.58 1.018 50.4% +7 +122 — 54.9% +0.18 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 102.2 -0.66
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2007 1862 154.0 +2.20 +2.02 1.085 51.5% -46 +130 — 61.4% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) 103.6 -0.30
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 2008 1802 143.5 +1.18 -1.42 0.981 49.5% +3 +61 — 51.1% -0.01 15–8 (65%) 18–12 (60%) 104.9 +1.20
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 2009 1716 107.3 -0.28 -2.72 0.875 48.1% +39 +108 — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.05
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 2010 1660 107.6 -1.98 -2.23 0.769 45.3% +63 +99 — 31.3% -1.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.30
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2030 154.8 +1.99 +1.65 1.084 51.4% -14 +105 -232 59.9% +0.53 182–116 (61%) 212–160 (57%) 103.7 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.