H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 4-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–1 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2009 Metz fourth round 7-5 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Christophe Rochus
BEL Age 47 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2009* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #47 7-5 4-6 6-2 Christophe Rochus #88 Match data
Apr 23, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Christophe Rochus #61 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #21 Match data
Oct 25, 2007* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Richard Gasquet #11 7-6(5) 6-3 Christophe Rochus #168 Match data
May 15, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Richard Gasquet #56 6-1 6-1 Christophe Rochus #68 Match data
Mar 4, 2004* Acapulco ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #86 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Christophe Rochus #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Christophe Rochus #998 #38 1,248 1,740 114 208 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Christophe Rochus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 1999 1–2 33.3% #121 1,502 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2000 14–22 38.9% #74 1,555 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2001 14–21 40.0% #69 1,617 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2002 10–21 32.3% #143 1,516 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2003 12–18 40.0% #84 1,573 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2004 9–18 33.3% #113 1,561 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2005 18–26 40.9% #41 1,554 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2006 15–26 36.6% #78 1,538 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2007 2–9 18.2% #194 1,609 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2008 5–7 41.7% #69 1,689 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2009 14–28 33.3% #86 1,610 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2010 0–10 0.0% #249 1,551 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —