H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs David Ferrer H2H: 3-10
David Ferrer holds a 10–3 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, David Ferrer leads 6–3 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, David Ferrer won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
10
13 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | David Ferrer | 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 13, 2015* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 7-5 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2013* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-4 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Sep 5, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-1 4-6 2-6 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | David Ferrer | 7-5 7-6(2) 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 19, 2012* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | David Ferrer | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2012* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-4 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2009* | Dubai | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-2 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2008* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-3 | David Ferrer | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2007 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2007* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | F | Hard | David Ferrer | 6-1 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2004* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Ferrer | 6-4 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| David Ferrer | #224 | #3 | 7,220 | 2,270 | 700 | 368 | 65.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Gasquet | David Ferrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #59 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #71 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 41–28 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #14 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,036 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #17 | 1,853 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 58–23 | 71.6% | #7 | 2,033 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 2011 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 2,108 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 | 2012 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #5 | 2,241 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 63–24 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,100 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 | 2014 | 55–24 | 69.6% | #10 | 2,065 | 0 | 21 |
| 33 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 | 2015 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #7 | 2,126 | 0 | 26 |
| 34 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 26 |
| 35 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,914 | 0 | 27 |
| 36 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #125 | 1,710 | 0 | 27 |
| 37 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 | 2019 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #224 | 1,804 | 0 | 27 |
| 38 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |