H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs David Nalbandian H2H: 0-7

David Nalbandian holds a 7–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Sydney semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main draw meetings
David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard David Nalbandian #11 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #25 Match data
Jun 14, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 QF Grass David Nalbandian #8 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) Richard Gasquet #10 Match data
Nov 3, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard David Nalbandian #21 6-2 6-4 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data
Jun 2, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay David Nalbandian #3 6-2 3-6 7-5 6-0 Richard Gasquet #40 Match data
Jun 29, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass David Nalbandian #19 6-4 7-6(3) 6-0 Richard Gasquet #20 Match data
May 26, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay David Nalbandian #8 6-4 7-5 7-6(1) Richard Gasquet #106 Match data
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay David Nalbandian #12 6-4 6-0 Richard Gasquet #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,070 356 185 65.8% 0 2 1 1 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet David Nalbandian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,738 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 1,988 0 2
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,905 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,982 0 4
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,940 0 5
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,032 0 7
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 37–14 72.5% #11 2,014 0 9
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,935 0 10
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,005 0 11
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,940 0 11
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2012 20–15 57.1% #82 1,883 0 11
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,871 0 11
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —