H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs David Nalbandian H2H: 0-7

David Nalbandian holds a 7–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, David Nalbandian leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, David Nalbandian won the 2009 Sydney International semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 7
7 main-draw meetings
David Nalbandian
ARG Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Nalbandian #11 6-4 6-3 Richard Gasquet #25 Match data Jan 17, 2009* SF Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
David Nalbandian #8 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) Richard Gasquet #10 Match data Jun 14, 2008* QF Queen's Club Championships International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
David Nalbandian #21 6-2 6-4 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data Nov 3, 2007* SF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
David Nalbandian #3 6-2 3-6 7-5 6-0 Richard Gasquet #40 Match data Jun 2, 2006* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Nalbandian #19 6-4 7-6(3) 6-0 Richard Gasquet #20 Match data Jun 29, 2005* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Nalbandian #8 6-4 7-5 7-6(1) Richard Gasquet #106 Match data May 26, 2004* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
David Nalbandian #12 6-4 6-0 Richard Gasquet #115 Match data Apr 16, 2003* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
David Nalbandian #231 #3 3,500 2,078 358 187 65.7% 0 2 1 1 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet David Nalbandian
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #245 1,482 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2001 17–9 65.4% #47 1,739 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2002 36–23 61.0% #12 1,856 0 2
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2003 38–20 65.5% #8 2,001 0 2
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2004 33–14 70.2% #9 1,909 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2005 40–19 67.8% #6 1,983 0 4
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2006 39–16 70.9% #8 1,941 0 5
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2007 31–17 64.6% #9 2,034 0 7
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2008 39–15 72.2% #11 2,014 0 9
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 14–8 63.6% #64 1,941 0 10
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2010 25–10 71.4% #27 2,014 0 11
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2011 20–13 60.6% #64 1,964 0 11
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2012 20–16 55.6% #82 1,880 0 11
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 6–5 54.5% #229 1,869 0 11
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet David Nalbandian
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2002 9 9 18 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 21 10 31 67.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 14 8 22 63.6% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 21 11 32 65.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2007 23 10 33 69.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 23 8 31 74.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 20 8 28 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 13 9 22 59.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 180 98 278 64.7% 125 66 191 65.4% 29 14 43 67.4% 24 9 33 72.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 529/545 of David Nalbandian's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet David Nalbandian
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 2000 2/2 2.5 6.5 51.0% 68.0% 35.6% 59.2% 15.0% 52.1% 31.4%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2001 23/26 3.0 3.5 62.0% 68.7% 53.8% 54.5% 52.8% 63.1% 45.3%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2002 54/59 2.6 3.1 58.4% 66.4% 53.3% 58.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.2%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2003 57/58 3.3 3.7 57.7% 69.4% 52.6% 50.2% 49.3% 62.2% 42.7%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2004 47/47 4.1 2.9 60.0% 70.1% 53.2% 59.7% 50.0% 63.2% 41.3%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2005 59/59 3.2 2.7 61.6% 68.9% 54.8% 51.7% 48.8% 63.7% 43.9%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2006 55/55 3.1 3.3 60.9% 68.1% 55.3% 64.5% 49.1% 63.0% 41.4%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2007 48/48 5.6 3.3 57.1% 73.4% 51.8% 62.5% 46.6% 64.2% 39.7%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2008 51/54 5.3 3.0 58.7% 73.8% 53.2% 60.4% 48.3% 65.4% 41.2%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2009 21/22 3.9 3.7 51.6% 70.5% 54.0% 46.2% 54.6% 62.5% 43.3%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2010 34/35 3.4 3.1 58.5% 73.4% 50.4% 55.6% 48.0% 64.1% 42.4%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2011 32/33 3.5 3.8 58.1% 70.0% 52.7% 62.5% 38.8% 62.5% 39.3%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2012 35/36 3.4 3.5 58.0% 70.2% 53.2% 56.6% 43.1% 63.2% 39.7%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2013 11/11 4.6 4.5 58.0% 69.9% 49.6% 47.1% 59.8% 61.4% 40.8%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 529/545 3.7 3.3 58.8% 70.1% 53.1% 57.2% 48.2% 63.1% 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet David Nalbandian
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 2000 1482 102.2 -1.59 -1.12 0.655 42.3% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.08
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 2001 1739 145.8 +1.20 +5.17 1.229 53.9% -114 +18 — 60.3% +1.05 4–1 (80%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -0.30
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 2002 1857 144.2 -0.29 +2.49 1.030 50.5% -88 -84 -106 56.4% +0.27 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) 112.4 -0.80
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 2003 2002 153.3 +0.97 +5.48 1.130 52.3% +9 -255 -154 62.7% +0.64 8–11 (42%) 15–9 (63%) 100.0 +0.37
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 2004 1910 152.1 +1.43 +3.62 1.123 52.4% +18 +13 — 65.4% +0.95 7–6 (54%) 13–7 (65%) 99.8 +0.96
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 2005 1983 155.5 +1.22 +6.61 1.209 53.5% +13 -69 -66 64.8% +0.98 7–9 (44%) 13–13 (50%) 93.3 +0.79
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 2006 1941 157.1 +0.94 +4.60 1.118 52.2% +6 +128 -31 66.0% +1.00 11–8 (58%) 7–13 (35%) 92.8 +0.24
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2007 2034 159.2 +2.25 +3.52 1.109 51.8% +31 -57 -168 61.6% +0.70 8–5 (62%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 +0.27
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2008 2015 156.9 +2.41 +4.20 1.191 52.9% +66 -36 -146 65.7% +0.90 11–4 (73%) 16–3 (84%) 111.1 +1.15
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2009 1941 145.8 +0.36 +3.91 1.154 52.6% +98 +24 — 63.5% +0.87 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) 94.3 +0.35
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2010 2015 167.2 +1.51 +5.37 1.181 53.2% +50 +7 — 65.9% +1.04 8–3 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 103.7 -1.13
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2011 1965 152.5 +0.32 +2.26 1.049 50.5% +46 +40 -25 59.2% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 6–1 (86%) 105.8 -0.83
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2012 1881 152.2 +0.89 +2.86 1.077 51.5% +99 +12 +43 55.3% +0.34 5–7 (42%) 8–3 (73%) 99.7 -2.55
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 2013 1870 142.5 -0.16 +2.69 1.057 50.9% +70 +63 — 55.2% +0.04 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.77
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2079 161.5 +1.10 +4.21 1.126 52.2% +21 -24 -71 62.2% +0.73 92–72 (56%) 118–80 (60%) 104.0 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.