H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Denis Istomin H2H: 6-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 6–2 lead over Denis Istomin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2017 Metz third round 1-6 6-4 6-4.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 21, 2017* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Denis Istomin #82 1-6 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #30 Match data
Feb 7, 2015* Montpellier ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #28 6-3 6-4 Denis Istomin #61 Match data
Oct 29, 2014* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #23 6-7(4) 6-2 4-0 (ret.) Denis Istomin #55 Match data
Aug 27, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Gasquet #14 7-5 7-6(5) 6-4 Denis Istomin #44 Match data
Jun 21, 2014* Eastbourne ATP 250 SF Grass Richard Gasquet #14 6-4 6-2 Denis Istomin #49 Match data
Jan 14, 2012* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Denis Istomin #67 6-4 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #18 Match data
Apr 12, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #18 5-7 6-3 6-4 Denis Istomin #55 Match data
Jan 22, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #25 6-3 6-4 6-4 Denis Istomin #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16