H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 3-4

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 4–3 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Dmitry Tursunov leads 4–3 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2013 US Open third round 6-3 2-6 6-4 4-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #318 6-3 2-6 6-4 4-2 (ret.) Dmitry Tursunov #34 Match data
Oct 8, 2010* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #432 7-6(2) 1-6 6-4 Richard Gasquet #30 Match data
Jan 15, 2009* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #25 7-6(4) 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #30 Match data
Jul 31, 2008* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #34 7-6(8) 6-0 Richard Gasquet #11 Match data
Mar 30, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #35 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #8 Match data
Mar 6, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #8 6-4 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #36 Match data
Jan 11, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #35 3-6 6-3 6-4 Richard Gasquet #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,914 223 215 50.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,681 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,738 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,785 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2008 35–21 62.5% #22 1,861 0 5
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,705 0 6
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,767 0 7
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2012 3–9 25.0% #122 1,698 0 7
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,746 0 7
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,676 0 7
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,622 0 7
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —