H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 4-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–1 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2016 Marseille fourth round 7-6(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2016* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 7-6(5) 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #75 Match data
Feb 5, 2016* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-4 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #82 Match data
Feb 22, 2014* Marseille ATP 250 SF Hard Ernests Gulbis #23 6-3 6-2 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Oct 12, 2010* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #31 6-1 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #26 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #23 6-2 1-6 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —