H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 2-2

Richard Gasquet and Fabio Fognini are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on clay, while Richard Gasquet leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2018 Bastad final 6-3 3-6 6-1.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 2018* Bastad ATP 250 F Clay Fabio Fognini #15 6-3 3-6 6-1 Richard Gasquet #29 Match data
Apr 20, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Fabio Fognini #32 7-6(0) 6-2 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Jan 13, 2012* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #18 6-2 6-1 Fabio Fognini #46 Match data
Sep 28, 2007* Mumbai ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #14 6-0 6-1 Fabio Fognini #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16