H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 7-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 7–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2020 Montpellier fourth round 6-7(1) 6-4 6-2.

France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 7, 2020* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #58 6-7(1) 6-4 6-2 Feliciano Lopez #55 Match data
Oct 26, 2017* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #32 6-2 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #33 Match data
Jun 21, 2014* Eastbourne ATP 250 F Grass Feliciano Lopez #25 6-3 6-7(5) 7-5 Richard Gasquet #14 Match data
Jan 14, 2010* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #53 6-1 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #46 Match data
Jan 17, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #8 6-2 6-1 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #37 Match data
Jul 16, 2006* Gstaad ATP 250 F Clay Richard Gasquet #60 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 Feliciano Lopez #68 Match data
Aug 17, 2005* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #15 7-5 4-6 6-1 Feliciano Lopez #25 Match data
Feb 13, 2003* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #139 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7