H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Gilles Muller H2H: 4-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–2 lead over Gilles Muller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2015 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 13, 2015* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #11 7-6(4) 6-2 Gilles Muller #36 Match data
Aug 6, 2015* Washington ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #13 5-7 6-4 6-4 Gilles Muller #46 Match data
Sep 26, 2014* Shenzhen ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #21 6-3 6-2 Gilles Muller #60 Match data
Feb 21, 2013* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Gilles Muller #70 2-6 6-4 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #10 Match data
Sep 24, 2011* Metz ATP 250 QF Hard Gilles Muller #49 6-3 6-4 Richard Gasquet #15 Match data
Jun 26, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #20 7-6(3) 6-3 6-3 Gilles Muller #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —