H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 4-0

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2018 Marrakech fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 2018* Marrakech ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #38 6-2 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #67 Match data
May 2, 2015* Estoril ATP 250 SF Clay Richard Gasquet #28 3-6 6-2 7-6(1) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #31 Match data
Apr 13, 2011* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #18 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #27 Match data
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #101 6-2 6-0 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —