H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Igor Andreev H2H: 4-4

Richard Gasquet and Igor Andreev are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2011 Rome Masters third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #16 6-1 6-2 Igor Andreev #106 Match data
Apr 21, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #78 7-6(5) 6-4 Igor Andreev #48 Match data
Mar 7, 2008* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Igor Andreev #34 6-3 6-4 Richard Gasquet #8 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #8 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-4 Igor Andreev #35 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #8 6-3 7-6(6) Igor Andreev #34 Match data
Jul 14, 2007* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Igor Andreev #59 7-5 6-2 Richard Gasquet #7 Match data
Jan 12, 2006* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Igor Andreev #26 6-2 6-4 Richard Gasquet #17 Match data
Jun 9, 2004* Queen's Club ATP 250 R64 Grass Igor Andreev #60 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Igor Andreev #1,011 #18 2,490 1,913 219 214 50.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Igor Andreev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2004 25–26 49.0% #50 1,660 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,832 0 3
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,760 0 3
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2008 38–27 58.5% #19 1,882 0 3
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,693 0 3
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —