H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 6-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 6–1 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2020 US Open first round 7-6(0) 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2020* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Gasquet #318 7-6(0) 7-6(4) 6-1 Ivo Karlovic #126 Match data
Oct 31, 2015* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #11 6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(6) Ivo Karlovic #23 Match data
May 5, 2015* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #23 6-3 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #25 Match data
Aug 7, 2014* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #13 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 Ivo Karlovic #31 Match data
Oct 19, 2013* Moscow ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-4 7-5 Ivo Karlovic #86 Match data
Sep 1, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #94 6-4 6-2 2-6 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #318 Match data
May 11, 2005* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #56 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Ivo Karlovic #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8