H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs James Blake H2H: 2-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 2–1 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2008 Indian Wells Open fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #9 6-4 6-2 Richard Gasquet #8 Match data Mar 20, 2008* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #13 6-4 6-4 James Blake #7 Match data Nov 2, 2007* R16 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #51 6-4 6-3 James Blake #6 Match data Aug 10, 2006* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet James Blake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 563/586 of James Blake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet James Blake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet James Blake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.08
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.19
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.97
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.11
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) — -1.49
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) — +0.23
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) — +3.66
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) — +4.15
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.82
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.57
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.24
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.69
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.