H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 5-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2013 Montpellier semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 9, 2013* Montpellier ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-3 3-6 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #67 Match data
Sep 29, 2012* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Gasquet #14 3-6 7-5 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #38 Match data
Oct 29, 2010* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #44 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 Richard Gasquet #28 Match data
Jan 6, 2010* Brisbane ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #52 6-3 4-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #88 Match data
Mar 11, 2007* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #16 6-3 1-6 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #19 Match data
Oct 18, 2006* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #27 6-2 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Jarkko Nieminen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —