H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 4-5
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 5–4 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 3–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2016 Wimbledon fourth round 4-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
5
9 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 4-2 (ret.) | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2013* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2009* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2009* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Richard Gasquet | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2009* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2007* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-5 7-6(3) | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2007* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Gasquet | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| 37 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |
| 38 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |