H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs John Isner H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Eastbourne quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2017* Eastbourne ATP 250 QF Grass Richard Gasquet #27 6-3 6-2 John Isner #21 Match data
Aug 14, 2013* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard John Isner #22 7-6(6) 6-2 Richard Gasquet #11 Match data
Aug 11, 2012* Canada Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Richard Gasquet #21 7-6(3) 6-3 John Isner #11 Match data
May 8, 2010* Belgrade ATP 250 QF Clay John Isner #21 2-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #86 Match data
Nov 6, 2009* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #57 4-6 7-6(9) 6-2 John Isner #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —