H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs John Isner H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over John Isner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–1 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Eastbourne Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #27 6-3 6-2 John Isner #21 Match data Jun 30, 2017* QF Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
John Isner #22 7-6(6) 6-2 Richard Gasquet #11 Match data Aug 14, 2013* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #21 7-6(3) 6-3 John Isner #11 Match data Aug 11, 2012* SF Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
John Isner #21 2-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #86 Match data May 8, 2010* QF Belgrade ATP 250 Clay
Richard Gasquet #57 4-6 7-6(9) 6-2 John Isner #40 Match data Nov 6, 2009* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,068 470 294 61.5% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,607 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,829 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,884 0 1
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,020 0 3
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2012 41–19 68.3% #14 1,977 0 5
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,984 0 7
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,935 0 9
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,028 0 10
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,021 0 10
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,985 0 12
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,958 0 14
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,922 0 15
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,945 0 16
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,925 0 16
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,711 0 16
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet John Isner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 25 17 42 59.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 29 13 42 69.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 26 13 39 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 27 12 39 69.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 26 14 40 65.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 27 14 41 65.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 31 14 45 68.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 22 13 35 62.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 23 14 37 62.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 20 16 36 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 24 16 40 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2021 18 8 26 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2022 11 10 21 52.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 341 206 547 62.3% 75 59 134 56.0% 54 29 83 65.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 756/764 of John Isner's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet John Isner
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2007 13/13 19.6 3.1 67.2% 78.2% 59.4% 65.5% 19.8% 71.9% 26.6%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2008 29/30 15.0 3.4 66.9% 77.1% 52.3% 60.0% 26.1% 68.8% 27.4%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2009 45/45 14.5 2.5 67.1% 75.0% 57.4% 65.9% 29.5% 69.1% 30.0%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2010 58/58 17.8 2.3 69.1% 76.5% 55.9% 68.0% 39.3% 70.1% 29.9%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2011 53/53 15.2 2.8 69.2% 78.0% 55.6% 62.5% 40.1% 71.2% 31.5%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2012 56/60 16.7 2.2 67.9% 78.2% 57.0% 72.2% 33.2% 71.6% 31.1%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2013 60/60 16.3 1.7 67.7% 79.4% 57.8% 66.5% 33.7% 72.2% 31.1%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2014 57/58 17.4 1.8 67.8% 79.1% 57.8% 73.0% 27.3% 72.1% 30.2%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2015 68/68 18.5 1.8 70.3% 80.2% 58.6% 74.8% 37.5% 73.8% 29.6%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2016 50/50 23.2 2.7 69.2% 82.4% 55.3% 68.3% 35.9% 73.9% 30.7%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2017 57/57 19.7 2.2 70.6% 80.6% 56.5% 63.6% 41.2% 73.5% 29.1%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2018 54/54 22.4 2.4 69.1% 81.3% 56.7% 70.1% 30.6% 73.7% 29.7%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2019 46/46 21.8 1.7 71.0% 81.4% 58.6% 70.1% 34.2% 74.7% 29.8%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% 2020 17/17 21.9 3.5 71.5% 78.6% 54.9% 84.1% 25.0% 72.2% 28.8%
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% 2021 33/34 20.6 2.1 68.5% 79.0% 55.9% 62.7% 34.5% 71.8% 28.4%
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% 2022 37/38 22.6 2.8 68.8% 80.3% 54.1% 64.9% 36.6% 72.1% 27.7%
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% 2023 23/23 20.9 2.9 67.7% 79.7% 57.4% 72.2% 18.8% 72.3% 28.0%
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 756/764 18.8 2.3 68.9% 79.2% 56.7% 68.4% 33.7% 72.2% 29.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet John Isner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2007 1656 138.0 +5.43 -3.75 0.947 49.4% +37 — — 54.1% -0.19 5–1 (83%) 12–7 (63%) — +0.01
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2008 1608 128.0 +4.14 -6.69 0.881 48.3% +39 -96 -116 41.0% -0.51 4–8 (33%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.16
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2009 1830 145.6 +4.72 -4.63 0.972 50.0% +1 -280 — 57.0% +0.23 12–6 (67%) 26–12 (68%) — +0.93
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2010 1885 154.2 +5.86 -4.84 1.002 50.5% +41 -194 — 58.8% +0.34 19–9 (68%) 32–16 (67%) — +2.28
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2011 2020 160.4 +7.13 -3.98 1.097 51.5% +30 -361 -297 61.6% +0.53 11–11 (50%) 32–20 (62%) — +1.83
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2012 1978 157.8 +7.12 -4.36 1.092 51.3% +43 -260 -71 62.7% +0.43 15–10 (60%) 38–18 (68%) — +3.35
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2013 1985 159.0 +7.64 -3.71 1.119 51.3% +52 -198 -94 59.5% +0.36 18–11 (62%) 36–17 (68%) — +3.48
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2014 1935 157.9 +7.20 -4.42 1.079 50.8% +50 -99 -27 61.8% +0.44 12–6 (67%) 41–21 (66%) — +3.24
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2015 2029 168.0 +8.71 -4.22 1.132 51.6% +54 -121 -120 62.7% +0.57 12–9 (57%) 39–25 (61%) — +3.80
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2016 2021 163.0 +8.76 -3.60 1.179 51.8% +44 -140 -79 58.6% +0.48 9–10 (47%) 31–30 (51%) — +1.41
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2017 1986 158.3 +8.00 -5.60 1.094 51.2% +14 -91 -60 60.0% +0.42 11–9 (55%) 40–24 (63%) — +3.24
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2018 1959 158.8 +8.37 -4.32 1.129 51.3% -23 -61 +77 57.0% +0.42 14–11 (56%) 37–32 (54%) — +2.48
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 2019 1922 154.7 +8.16 -3.97 1.178 51.7% -6 — +115 61.2% +0.47 8–7 (53%) 29–23 (56%) — +3.19
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 2020 1846 134.4 +4.91 -4.34 1.035 50.7% +22 — — 60.9% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 14–7 (67%) — +1.74
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 2021 1945 152.3 +6.93 -5.43 1.006 50.2% 0 +9 — 62.5% +0.27 10–5 (67%) 21–9 (70%) — +0.90
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 2022 1926 145.5 +6.21 -5.79 0.996 49.8% -21 +13 +80 55.1% -0.02 11–8 (58%) 30–17 (64%) — +1.11
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 2023 1711 125.8 +5.40 -5.66 1.012 49.9% +36 — +244 45.3% -0.14 3–6 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +1.74
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2068 162.0 +7.10 -4.58 1.071 50.9% +25 -137 -39 58.7% +0.34 177–130 (58%) 482–307 (61%) 111.1 +4.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.