H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 4-0

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2016 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #12 6-3 6-0 Julien Benneteau #607 Match data
Feb 9, 2013* Montpellier ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-1 4-6 6-1 Julien Benneteau #38 Match data
Jan 16, 2010* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Gasquet #53 6-4 7-5 Julien Benneteau #45 Match data
Jan 11, 2007* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #18 6-1 6-4 Julien Benneteau #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,955 269 292 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,547 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,533 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,793 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,853 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,871 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2012 26–21 55.3% #35 1,874 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,861 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,801 0 0
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,807 0 0
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,862 0 0
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —