H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Kristof Vliegen H2H: 3-3

Richard Gasquet and Kristof Vliegen are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristof Vliegen won the 2010 Washington second round 6-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Kristof Vliegen
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2010* Washington ATP 500 R64 Hard Kristof Vliegen #359 6-3 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #40 Match data
Apr 23, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #9 6-1 6-2 Kristof Vliegen #97 Match data
Sep 27, 2007* Mumbai ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #14 6-1 6-2 Kristof Vliegen #80 Match data
Jul 13, 2007* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #7 6-3 6-4 Kristof Vliegen #75 Match data
May 31, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Kristof Vliegen #74 7-6(4) 6-3 6-1 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data
May 17, 2006* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Kristof Vliegen #41 6-4 6-2 Richard Gasquet #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Kristof Vliegen #452 #30 1,008 1,798 83 114 42.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Kristof Vliegen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 5–8 38.5% #116 1,503 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 9–14 39.1% #116 1,561 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 7–9 43.8% #93 1,595 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 31–22 58.5% #31 1,724 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 13–23 36.1% #98 1,629 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 7–16 30.4% #84 1,626 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 9–12 42.9% #110 1,696 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 2–10 16.7% #257 1,598 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —