H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Marat Safin H2H: 2-4

Marat Safin holds a 4–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Marat Safin leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marat Safin won the 2009 St. Petersburg third round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Marat Safin
RUS Age 46 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 2009* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Marat Safin #77 7-6(5) 6-4 Richard Gasquet #69 Match data
Feb 26, 2009* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #26 6-3 5-7 6-3 Marat Safin #25 Match data
Nov 4, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Marat Safin #37 (w/o) Richard Gasquet #20 Match data
Oct 26, 2006* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Richard Gasquet #24 6-4 7-6(5) Marat Safin #36 Match data
Oct 10, 2002* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Marat Safin #4 6-4 7-6(5) Richard Gasquet #168 Match data
Apr 18, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marat Safin #6 6-4 6-1 Richard Gasquet #589 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Marat Safin #61 #1 4,300 2,100 395 247 61.5% 2 5 0 0 8 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Marat Safin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #203 1,490 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 1998 16–16 50.0% #49 1,664 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 1999 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 1
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2000 69–23 75.0% #2 2,060 1 8
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2001 43–23 65.2% #11 1,923 1 10
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2002 48–23 67.6% #3 1,892 1 11
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2003 12–13 48.0% #77 1,727 1 11
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2004 50–21 70.4% #4 1,987 1 14
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2005 25–11 69.4% #12 1,948 2 15
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2006 33–23 58.9% #26 1,879 2 15
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2007 21–19 52.5% #56 1,756 2 15
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2008 24–23 51.1% #29 1,780 2 15
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2009 18–22 45.0% #61 1,777 2 15
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —