H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 3-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2009 Brisbane International first round 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #23 4-6 6-2 6-2 Marc Gicquel #50 Match data Jan 7, 2009* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Hard
Marc Gicquel #60 7-5 7-6(6) Richard Gasquet #9 Match data Jun 20, 2008* R16 Libéma Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gasquet #16 7-6(2) 6-2 Marc Gicquel #46 Match data Feb 16, 2007* R16 Marseille International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #24 6-3 6-1 Marc Gicquel #61 Match data Oct 29, 2006* F Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Marc Gicquel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Marc Gicquel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Marc Gicquel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2%
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8%
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0%
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Marc Gicquel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.