H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Michael Berrer H2H: 2-2

Richard Gasquet and Michael Berrer are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Berrer won the 2015 Indian Wells Open second round 7-6(6) 4-6 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Michael Berrer
GER Age 46 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Berrer #161 7-6(6) 4-6 3-1 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #25 Match data Mar 15, 2015* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Michael Berrer #66 5-2 (ret.) Richard Gasquet #30 Match data Feb 5, 2011* QF Zagreb ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #41 6-4 6-2 Michael Berrer #51 Match data Aug 18, 2010* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #47 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) Michael Berrer #127 Match data Sep 24, 2009* R32 Metz ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Michael Berrer #952 #42 960 1,783 88 143 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Berrer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2004 0–1 0.0% #235 1,498 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2005 1–2 33.3% #126 1,526 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2006 4–11 26.7% #152 1,513 0 0
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2007 13–12 52.0% #57 1,672 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2008 8–20 28.6% #131 1,544 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2009 5–8 38.5% #74 1,628 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2010 20–28 41.7% #58 1,682 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2011 17–22 43.6% #100 1,701 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2012 5–11 31.2% #138 1,702 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2013 2–3 40.0% #143 1,619 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2014 3–6 33.3% #128 1,577 0 0
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2015 6–10 37.5% #115 1,682 0 0
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 2016 4–9 30.8% #182 1,630 0 0
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Berrer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2010 18 20 38 47.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 11 15 26 42.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 66 93 159 41.5% 14 32 46 30.4% 7 17 24 29.2% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 231/231 of Michael Berrer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Berrer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2004 1/1 6.0 6.0 67.3% 75.0% 59.5% 83.3% 12.5% 69.9% 30.4%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2005 3/3 5.3 2.7 62.5% 75.1% 47.4% 38.3% 20.0% 64.3% 28.4%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2006 15/15 7.3 4.9 60.7% 72.0% 50.6% 46.5% 44.5% 63.8% 34.0%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2007 25/25 6.6 3.1 62.8% 75.3% 53.0% 64.8% 47.8% 66.9% 34.7%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2008 28/28 5.0 4.2 62.2% 71.3% 48.5% 63.0% 33.3% 62.6% 32.6%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2009 13/13 5.3 4.8 66.1% 67.2% 44.5% 56.2% 38.1% 59.1% 38.0%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2010 48/48 5.2 2.9 63.8% 71.8% 48.4% 58.2% 48.4% 63.2% 33.7%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2011 39/39 5.0 2.9 64.1% 70.2% 48.9% 61.9% 36.7% 62.7% 35.2%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2012 16/16 5.7 2.1 67.9% 65.9% 48.6% 55.4% 30.5% 60.4% 34.2%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2013 5/5 4.0 3.6 65.1% 66.6% 41.8% 67.3% 38.3% 57.7% 41.6%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2014 9/9 5.2 2.2 65.3% 69.7% 50.5% 67.3% 56.4% 63.2% 31.3%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2015 16/16 9.1 5.3 61.6% 73.3% 47.8% 60.3% 38.4% 63.3% 29.9%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% 2016 13/13 5.0 2.0 68.5% 68.0% 45.1% 55.1% 40.0% 60.9% 33.9%
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 231/231 5.7 3.4 64.0% 70.9% 48.7% 59.4% 40.9% 62.9% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Berrer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2004 1499 100.3 -2.11 -0.14 1.009 50.2% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.08
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2005 1526 108.7 +0.14 -0.27 0.796 46.0% — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — -0.19
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2006 1513 118.6 +1.11 -2.59 0.940 48.7% +37 -67 — 41.9% -0.51 1–8 (11%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.15
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2007 1673 130.6 +2.81 -0.76 1.048 50.8% -7 — -37 50.8% +0.06 3–4 (43%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.13
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2008 1545 124.1 -0.69 -3.10 0.871 48.0% +23 -66 +67 32.8% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.27
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2009 1628 128.4 -2.08 +1.27 0.929 48.6% +32 — — 45.7% -0.66 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.28
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2010 1683 144.9 +0.52 -2.26 0.916 48.7% +31 -202 — 43.4% -0.38 7–9 (44%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.18
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2011 1702 133.8 +0.20 -1.21 0.942 48.8% 0 -117 -153 40.9% -0.48 7–2 (78%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.63
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2012 1703 132.9 -1.36 -1.40 0.863 47.4% +51 -96 — 36.6% -0.80 2–6 (25%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.05
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2013 1619 114.2 -1.90 +0.16 0.984 49.4% — +9 — 55.6% +0.89 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.28
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2014 1577 118.3 -1.12 -1.64 0.851 47.7% +99 — — 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.38
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 2015 1683 127.9 -0.17 -3.86 0.815 47.5% +39 — — 39.0% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.50
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 2016 1630 116.0 -1.84 -2.40 0.866 47.8% +71 -116 — 37.5% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — 0.00
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1784 132.8 +0.02 -1.79 0.914 48.6% +28 -108 -60 41.2% -0.55 31–49 (39%) 43–61 (41%) 94.0 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.