H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Michael Llodra H2H: 3-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–1 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Swiss Indoors first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Llodra #55 6-4 6-2 Richard Gasquet #10 Match data Oct 24, 2013* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Richard Gasquet #24 6-4 6-0 Michael Llodra #90 Match data Mar 15, 2009* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #11 3-6 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Michael Llodra #36 Match data Jul 30, 2008* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Richard Gasquet #12 6-2 4-6 6-3 Michael Llodra #36 Match data Jul 23, 2008* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,902 183 216 45.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Llodra
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,597 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,601 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,619 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,732 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,641 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2008 22–20 52.4% #40 1,731 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,741 0 3
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,881 0 5
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,844 0 5
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,808 0 5
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,698 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Llodra
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 109 133 242 45.0% 20 37 57 35.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 10 16 26 38.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 381/399 of Michael Llodra's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Llodra
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2000 11/12 7.0 5.4 55.8% 74.2% 49.8% 51.0% 43.0% 63.8% 37.2%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2001 12/17 6.9 6.0 58.9% 69.2% 48.7% 51.2% 42.0% 60.8% 35.4%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2002 21/29 7.1 4.8 60.1% 75.3% 45.0% 49.2% 42.4% 63.4% 37.0%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2003 12/12 8.6 5.0 60.6% 68.2% 46.2% 60.6% 28.3% 59.2% 32.1%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2004 32/32 6.2 2.3 65.1% 75.9% 54.2% 69.7% 41.2% 68.4% 38.7%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2005 30/30 5.8 2.4 64.8% 70.1% 50.5% 58.0% 42.5% 63.1% 31.6%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2006 12/12 7.8 1.9 62.3% 70.8% 47.5% 44.9% 33.4% 62.4% 36.9%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2007 31/31 7.4 3.4 62.9% 72.6% 53.4% 65.0% 37.6% 65.4% 35.3%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2008 40/42 9.3 3.4 60.4% 73.5% 54.2% 66.1% 37.6% 65.9% 33.1%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2009 33/33 9.1 2.6 63.3% 77.3% 53.3% 63.8% 41.8% 68.4% 34.3%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2010 48/48 9.1 3.1 62.4% 76.1% 51.5% 63.3% 50.3% 66.9% 34.2%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2011 38/38 7.2 3.3 62.4% 73.7% 51.0% 64.3% 30.8% 65.2% 32.7%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% 2012 26/26 8.4 2.4 63.5% 73.4% 52.5% 59.8% 32.6% 65.6% 32.6%
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% 2013 25/27 7.6 3.3 61.3% 75.3% 53.0% 53.8% 43.7% 66.3% 35.8%
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% 2014 10/10 6.4 1.8 68.9% 70.3% 49.8% 53.7% 30.0% 64.0% 33.2%
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 381/399 7.8 3.2 62.4% 73.8% 51.5% 60.7% 39.6% 65.4% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Michael Llodra
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 2000 1598 127.1 +0.78 +0.37 1.028 50.1% -44 — +71 38.7% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.08
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 2001 1601 121.3 -0.66 -1.24 0.903 48.1% -29 -103 +64 41.5% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.02
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2002 1619 130.3 +1.08 -0.25 1.013 50.6% -10 -111 +6 44.4% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.43
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2003 1590 113.0 -0.96 -3.38 0.786 45.9% -53 — — 33.3% -1.30 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2004 1733 139.9 +4.02 +2.13 1.223 53.3% -62 -149 +32 63.0% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.92
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2005 1625 132.1 +0.29 -3.47 0.857 47.8% +4 -99 +170 35.1% -0.60 7–5 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.74
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2006 1609 120.1 +0.77 -0.43 0.981 49.5% -12 -86 — 35.7% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.12
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 2007 1641 132.2 +1.45 -1.19 1.018 50.2% -30 -51 +115 44.7% -0.28 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.22
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 2008 1731 142.8 +2.39 -1.86 0.973 49.3% -31 -60 +34 55.0% +0.08 5–6 (45%) 23–15 (61%) — -1.31
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 2009 1741 139.4 +3.47 -1.08 1.087 51.3% +1 — +41 48.6% -0.10 5–2 (71%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.08
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 2010 1881 147.2 +3.24 -1.57 1.032 50.8% -56 -189 +40 58.3% +0.38 3–5 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.02
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 2011 1777 149.5 +1.94 -2.27 0.938 49.2% -37 -84 +194 47.8% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.28
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 2012 1844 157.9 +2.15 -1.12 0.948 48.9% +43 -156 — 46.3% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.17
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 2013 1809 148.4 +2.33 -0.44 1.061 50.8% +25 — +52 52.5% +0.05 0–6 (0%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.76
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 2014 1699 117.2 -0.35 -1.74 0.922 48.9% +10 +3 — 42.9% -0.33 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.81
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1903 146.8 +1.98 -1.22 0.996 50.0% -20 -99 +73 48.2% -0.09 42–57 (42%) 100–102 (50%) 99.1 -1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.