Richard Gasquet
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 2 | 18 | 20 | Jul 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Gael Monfils | 7 | 11 | 18 | Feb 28, 2020 | H2H |
| Rafael Nadal | 0 | 17 | 17 | Sep 4, 2022 | H2H |
| Tomas Berdych | 7 | 9 | 16 | May 8, 2018 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 5 | 10 | 15 | Aug 17, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs Michael Rubin
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Richard Gasquet vs Michael Rubin.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | 6-2 6-3 | Michael Rubin | Match data | Aug 23, 2009 | Q1 | New Haven | ATP 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,167 | 597 | 407 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Michael Rubin | #1,744 | #834 | 16 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Richard Gasquet | Michael Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,943 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,872 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,918 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,942 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,130 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,946 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,854 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,827 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,862 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,629 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,619 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,635 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Richard Gasquet | Michael Rubin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1487 | 119.7 | -0.88 | -2.02 | 0.654 | 43.2% | — | +45 | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.22 | 2009 | 1506 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1464 | 108.5 | -1.22 | -3.66 | 0.802 | 46.1% | +15 | — | — | 35.0% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1598 | 134.4 | +0.68 | +0.33 | 1.010 | 49.9% | -88 | +43 | — | 47.8% | +0.04 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1853 | 149.2 | +5.23 | +5.39 | 1.360 | 55.3% | -193 | -39 | -28 | 64.4% | +1.12 | 8–3 (73%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | +1.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1943 | 156.3 | +3.83 | +2.24 | 1.161 | 52.4% | -72 | -97 | -29 | 62.5% | +0.91 | 6–7 (46%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -1.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1943 | 155.4 | +3.41 | +3.74 | 1.214 | 53.4% | -19 | -91 | +81 | 65.9% | +1.08 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | +1.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1873 | 150.1 | +3.66 | +1.51 | 1.155 | 52.4% | +5 | -37 | +152 | 58.3% | +0.73 | 7–11 (39%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1848 | 149.0 | +0.29 | +1.36 | 1.015 | 50.2% | +4 | -13 | — | 54.2% | +0.19 | 11–5 (69%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1918 | 155.1 | +3.11 | +1.40 | 1.143 | 52.2% | -23 | -1 | — | 61.0% | +0.78 | 12–8 (60%) | 16–15 (52%) | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1988 | 167.4 | +3.13 | +2.71 | 1.132 | 52.4% | -46 | +73 | +120 | 62.4% | +0.91 | 7–2 (78%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1994 | 163.9 | +4.12 | +2.23 | 1.183 | 52.8% | -11 | +103 | +57 | 62.5% | +1.04 | 10–5 (67%) | 9–11 (45%) | — | +2.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2047 | 171.5 | +3.13 | +3.52 | 1.172 | 52.4% | +63 | -22 | -16 | 62.9% | +0.88 | 14–8 (64%) | 15–14 (52%) | — | +2.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1943 | 155.4 | +2.66 | +0.65 | 1.097 | 51.6% | +48 | +77 | +40 | 59.5% | +0.45 | 4–3 (57%) | 15–5 (75%) | — | +1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 2131 | 168.9 | +4.39 | +4.09 | 1.241 | 53.7% | -20 | -28 | -21 | 65.8% | +0.95 | 10–5 (67%) | 17–11 (61%) | — | -2.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1997 | 160.4 | +1.07 | +4.24 | 1.159 | 52.5% | -13 | +138 | +75 | 65.0% | +0.86 | 7–6 (54%) | 11–3 (79%) | — | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1957 | 159.4 | +1.64 | +3.20 | 1.115 | 51.9% | +3 | +83 | +33 | 57.6% | +0.76 | 12–6 (67%) | 5–11 (31%) | — | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1946 | 159.9 | +0.49 | +2.56 | 1.078 | 51.2% | -14 | +68 | +38 | 58.8% | +0.63 | 7–3 (70%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1854 | 143.3 | +0.23 | -0.88 | 0.947 | 49.1% | +17 | +41 | +67 | 49.4% | -0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 12–6 (67%) | — | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1828 | 145.2 | +1.00 | -1.54 | 0.959 | 49.6% | +19 | — | — | 54.2% | -0.10 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1780 | 140.9 | -0.22 | -1.71 | 0.914 | 48.5% | +24 | +86 | — | 47.1% | -0.47 | 3–3 (50%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1863 | 144.7 | -0.23 | +0.37 | 1.000 | 49.9% | -15 | -46 | +80 | 54.1% | +0.18 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | -2.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1630 | 129.6 | -1.55 | +0.19 | 0.944 | 48.9% | +94 | +11 | +193 | 39.4% | -0.58 | 8–9 (47%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1620 | 129.6 | +0.21 | -2.21 | 0.861 | 46.9% | +35 | +35 | — | 24.4% | -1.32 | 1–1 | 5–7 (42%) | — | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1635 | 123.9 | -0.95 | +1.79 | 0.991 | 50.0% | -17 | +46 | — | 46.2% | -0.08 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2167 | 162.1 | +2.19 | +1.99 | 1.103 | 51.6% | -3 | +18 | +49 | 57.9% | +0.55 | 160–120 (57%) | 220–188 (54%) | 103.6 | +0.22 | Career | 1516 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Michael Rubin
all rivalries →No career rivalry data available.