H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 4-3

Richard Gasquet holds a 4–3 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2016 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2016* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Richard Gasquet #10 6-4 6-0 Nicolas Almagro #64 Match data
May 2, 2015* Estoril ATP 250 QF Clay Richard Gasquet #28 6-1 7-6(4) Nicolas Almagro #174 Match data
Mar 27, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #318 6-3 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #11 Match data
Aug 12, 2011* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Nicolas Almagro #10 7-6(5) 6-3 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data
Aug 1, 2010* Gstaad ATP 250 F Clay Nicolas Almagro #18 7-5 6-1 Richard Gasquet #47 Match data
Feb 25, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #27 3-6 7-5 7-6(7) Richard Gasquet #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —