H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Nikolay Davydenko H2H: 6-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 6–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2014 Australian Open second round 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #9 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #61 Match data
Jun 2, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #318 6-4 6-4 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #48 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Doha ATP 250 F Hard Richard Gasquet #10 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Nikolay Davydenko #44 Match data
Feb 18, 2012* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #49 7-5 6-3 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data
Feb 3, 2012* Montpellier ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #16 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #52 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #38 6-3 6-4 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #6 Match data
Apr 16, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Richard Gasquet #101 4-6 7-5 6-2 Nikolay Davydenko #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Nikolay Davydenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —