H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 2-3

Philipp Kohlschreiber holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Kohlschreiber won the 2019 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 31, 2019* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Philipp Kohlschreiber #73 6-3 6-2 Richard Gasquet #68 Match data
Feb 14, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #27 7-5 7-5 Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Feb 4, 2012* Montpellier ATP 250 QF Hard Philipp Kohlschreiber #33 6-2 3-6 6-3 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data
Jul 15, 2006* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Richard Gasquet #60 6-1 1-6 6-2 Philipp Kohlschreiber #72 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Richard Gasquet #20 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-2 Philipp Kohlschreiber #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,054 444 372 54.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,562 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,538 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,653 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,767 0 1
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,857 0 2
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,833 0 2
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,851 0 2
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,848 0 3
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,888 0 4
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2013 33–24 57.9% #22 1,937 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2014 32–25 56.1% #24 1,899 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,972 0 5
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2016 29–22 56.9% #32 1,874 0 6
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,957 0 7
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,886 0 7
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,787 0 7
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,725 0 7
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2021 7–8 46.7% #114 1,717 0 7
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 7
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —