H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-3

Radek Stepanek holds a 3–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2012 Shanghai Masters third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Radek Stepanek
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Radek Stepanek #41 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Richard Gasquet #16 7-5 6-3 6-0 Radek Stepanek #57 Match data
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane ATP 250 SF Hard Radek Stepanek #26 2-6 6-2 6-4 Richard Gasquet #23 Match data
Jun 11, 2005* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Radek Stepanek #16 3-6 6-1 6-2 Richard Gasquet #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Radek Stepanek #492 #8 2,700 2,034 366 283 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Radek Stepanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #165 1,488 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 1999 2–4 33.3% #169 1,501 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2001 0–1 0.0% #542 1,464 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2002 17–14 54.8% #63 1,659 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2003 24–22 52.2% #46 1,716 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2004 28–23 54.9% #33 1,790 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2005 45–26 63.4% #20 1,840 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2006 30–15 66.7% #19 1,865 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2007 27–21 56.2% #30 1,863 0 2
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2008 31–23 57.4% #27 1,837 0 2
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2009 44–19 69.8% #12 2,010 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2010 17–15 53.1% #62 1,872 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2011 30–24 55.6% #28 1,880 0 5
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2012 21–19 52.5% #31 1,930 0 5
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2013 14–16 46.7% #44 1,828 0 5
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2014 16–17 48.5% #68 1,801 0 5
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2015 7–10 41.2% #197 1,766 0 5
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2016 10–11 47.6% #107 1,866 0 5
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 2017 3–2 60.0% #354 1,900 0 5
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —