H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Richard Gasquet vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 0-17
Rafael Nadal holds a 17–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 10–0 on hard courts and 7–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2022 US Open third round 6-0 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
17
17 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 6-1 7-5 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 7-5 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2017* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 31, 2015* | Basel | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 7-6(7) | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2014* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-0 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2013* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Sep 7, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 7-6(1) 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 14, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2011* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-2 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2008* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2008* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-7(12) 6-2 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Nov 12, 2007 | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 29, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2005* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2004* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Gasquet | Rafael Nadal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 |
| 20 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 |
| 21 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 |
| 22 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 |
| 24 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 |
| 25 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 |
| 26 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 |
| 27 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 |
| 28 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 |
| 29 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 |
| 31 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 |
| 32 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 |
| 33 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 |
| 34 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 |
| 35 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 |
| 36 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 |
| 37 | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 |
| 38 | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 |
| 39 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |