H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 0-1

Robby Ginepri holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2005 US Open round of 16 6-3 3-6 6-7(8) 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Robby Ginepri
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robby Ginepri #46 6-3 3-6 6-7(8) 6-4 6-0 Richard Gasquet #13 Match data Sep 7, 2005* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Robby Ginepri #1,221 #15 1,525 1,927 185 195 48.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Robby Ginepri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2001 3–5 37.5% #175 1,522 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2002 6–12 33.3% #100 1,580 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2003 31–19 62.0% #32 1,785 0 1
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2004 19–24 44.2% #63 1,696 0 1
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2005 37–23 61.7% #15 1,883 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2006 23–24 48.9% #51 1,803 0 2
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2007 11–20 35.5% #134 1,716 0 2
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2008 25–20 55.6% #51 1,813 0 2
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2009 13–18 41.9% #100 1,688 0 3
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2010 8–12 40.0% #144 1,670 0 3
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 2011 2–4 33.3% #311 1,666 0 3
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 2012 2–4 33.3% #287 1,598 0 3
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 2013 2–2 50.0% #214 1,638 0 3
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2014 3–8 27.3% #223 1,700 0 3
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Robby Ginepri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2002 1 9 10 10.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2003 24 14 38 63.2% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 15 17 32 46.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 33 14 47 70.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 16 15 31 51.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 9 13 22 40.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2008 18 13 31 58.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 4 9 13 30.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 141 135 276 51.1% 12 26 38 31.6% 24 26 50 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 369/380 of Robby Ginepri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Robby Ginepri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 2001 6/8 5.3 4.5 53.5% 67.1% 54.6% 60.8% 34.8% 61.0% 36.6%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2002 15/18 4.1 4.2 59.2% 64.5% 42.8% 42.3% 38.8% 55.7% 33.8%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2003 46/50 7.5 3.2 60.7% 72.6% 55.4% 55.0% 42.2% 65.6% 39.3%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2004 43/43 5.4 2.5 60.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.2% 44.6% 62.3% 37.6%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2005 60/60 6.6 1.8 63.2% 71.8% 55.4% 56.0% 46.0% 65.9% 38.4%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2006 47/47 6.0 1.6 64.9% 70.0% 52.8% 50.9% 40.9% 63.7% 37.3%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2007 31/31 6.2 1.8 63.5% 69.3% 49.8% 56.7% 44.2% 62.1% 37.3%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2008 43/45 5.3 1.9 63.9% 69.8% 51.1% 58.5% 42.6% 63.1% 39.3%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2009 31/31 5.3 2.0 62.6% 70.1% 48.8% 58.3% 44.6% 62.0% 35.5%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% 2010 20/20 5.6 2.0 64.4% 67.5% 54.9% 57.6% 34.7% 63.2% 34.6%
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% 2011 6/6 5.8 2.2 57.7% 66.7% 56.0% 43.5% 23.8% 62.0% 34.7%
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% 2012 6/6 4.0 2.8 60.6% 66.4% 55.9% 63.6% 44.6% 61.8% 36.8%
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% 2013 4/4 1.8 2.8 61.5% 61.1% 47.6% 56.3% 30.0% 55.6% 32.8%
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% 2014 11/11 3.3 2.5 63.5% 64.0% 48.7% 55.8% 33.9% 58.3% 31.6%
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 369/380 5.8 2.3 62.4% 69.6% 52.3% 55.3% 42.0% 63.1% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Robby Ginepri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 2000 1481 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35 2001 1523 117.9 -1.15 -0.35 0.938 49.1% +26 — — 38.1% -0.72 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.08
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52 2002 1581 123.3 -3.20 -1.12 0.763 45.0% -76 — +50 34.1% -1.16 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 98.3 -0.63
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51 2003 1785 147.0 +2.49 +2.21 1.143 52.3% -12 — -95 59.5% +0.79 7–7 (50%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +0.42
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61 2004 1696 139.3 -0.17 +1.22 0.999 50.0% +8 -189 +68 47.2% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 5–9 (36%) 95.5 -0.03
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90 2005 1884 148.3 +3.25 +1.61 1.126 52.0% +2 -411 -180 58.5% +0.73 10–6 (63%) 8–15 (35%) 99.5 +0.02
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85 2006 1803 139.7 +1.18 +0.14 1.029 50.3% +34 -366 -144 51.6% +0.12 8–11 (42%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +1.42
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00 2007 1717 139.0 -0.35 +0.22 0.983 49.8% +57 -332 -113 45.3% -0.09 2–10 (17%) 5–5 (50%) 90.6 -1.49
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44 2008 1813 148.5 +0.26 +2.58 1.067 51.2% +14 -260 -197 52.6% +0.37 10–6 (63%) 12–10 (55%) 109.0 -0.93
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77 2009 1689 131.9 -1.77 -0.74 0.934 48.9% +36 — -85 46.3% -0.13 4–9 (31%) 6–10 (38%) 90.6 +2.41
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10 2010 1670 126.1 +0.51 -0.78 0.940 48.8% -63 -1 -87 44.1% -0.49 2–5 (29%) 5–6 (45%) 96.7 +0.46
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40 2011 1667 118.7 -2.56 +0.17 0.913 48.0% -59 — — 37.5% -0.25 0–1 0–2 — +0.11
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22 2012 1598 118.5 -0.95 +0.14 0.963 49.4% +2 — — 41.2% -0.41 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59 2013 1638 118.5 -0.64 -2.79 0.739 45.0% — +48 — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — +0.21
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72 2014 1701 134.2 -3.94 -0.08 0.759 45.0% +1 — — 26.9% -1.58 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.2 -1.38
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58 2015 1652 113.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 1928 144.7 +0.52 +0.83 1.010 50.1% +7 -235 -76 49.6% +0.10 57–68 (46%) 67–87 (44%) 95.0 +0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.