H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Robin Haase H2H: 5-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 5–1 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Shanghai Masters second round 6-7(11) 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Robin Haase
NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 2017* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #31 6-7(11) 7-5 6-2 Robin Haase #44 Match data
Jun 24, 2017* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Richard Gasquet #30 6-1 3-6 6-1 Robin Haase #42 Match data
Feb 23, 2017* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #19 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Robin Haase #58 Match data
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #318 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) 6-4 Robin Haase #79 Match data
Jun 12, 2014* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Robin Haase #52 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #14 Match data
Oct 25, 2012* Basel ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #13 4-6 6-3 6-2 Robin Haase #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Robin Haase #1,206 #33 1,220 1,860 202 255 44.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Haase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #167 1,488 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2007 10–11 47.6% #114 1,618 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2008 12–13 48.0% #116 1,672 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2010 6–11 35.3% #65 1,691 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2011 25–24 51.0% #45 1,778 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2012 16–25 39.0% #56 1,700 0 2
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2013 28–26 51.9% #43 1,852 0 2
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2014 15–23 39.5% #83 1,715 0 2
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2015 14–20 41.2% #66 1,767 0 2
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2016 14–19 42.4% #59 1,756 0 2
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2017 25–29 46.3% #42 1,811 0 2
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2018 24–28 46.2% #50 1,779 0 2
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2019 11–18 37.9% #162 1,685 0 2
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2020 0–1 0.0% #197 1,661 0 2
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2021 1–3 25.0% #230 1,615 0 2
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2022 0–1 0.0% #258 1,568 0 2
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2023 1–1 50.0% #756 1,531 0 2
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —