H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Robin Soderling H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Robin Soderling
SWE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Gasquet #8 6-3 6-2 Robin Soderling #39 Match data
Feb 15, 2008* Marseille ATP 250 R16 Hard Robin Soderling #52 4-6 6-3 6-2 Richard Gasquet #7 Match data
Feb 17, 2007* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Robin Soderling #26 6-1 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #16 Match data
Oct 28, 2006* Lyon ATP 250 QF Carpet Richard Gasquet #24 4-6 6-3 6-3 Robin Soderling #26 Match data
Jun 24, 2006* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Richard Gasquet #66 7-6(7) 7-6(5) Robin Soderling #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,172 285 166 63.2% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,518 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,554 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2004 31–26 54.4% #34 1,824 0 1
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,831 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2008 40–19 67.8% #17 1,959 0 3
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,070 0 4
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,118 0 6
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —