H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Robin Soderling H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2008 Indian Wells Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Robin Soderling
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #8 6-3 6-2 Robin Soderling #39 Match data Mar 16, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Robin Soderling #52 4-6 6-3 6-2 Richard Gasquet #7 Match data Feb 15, 2008* R16 Marseille International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Robin Soderling #26 6-1 7-6(4) Richard Gasquet #16 Match data Feb 17, 2007* QF Marseille International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gasquet #24 4-6 6-3 6-3 Robin Soderling #26 Match data Oct 28, 2006* QF Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Richard Gasquet #66 7-6(7) 7-6(5) Robin Soderling #48 Match data Jun 24, 2006* SF Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Robin Soderling #195 #4 6,055 2,174 285 168 62.9% 0 1 0 2 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Soderling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #444 1,519 0 0
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 2002 1–5 16.7% #163 1,553 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2003 10–6 62.5% #60 1,728 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1 2004 31–27 53.4% #34 1,819 0 1
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4 2005 16–18 47.1% #77 1,737 0 2
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5 2006 33–22 60.0% #25 1,823 0 2
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5 2007 22–15 59.5% #41 1,832 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5 2008 40–20 66.7% #17 1,948 0 3
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6 2009 44–23 65.7% #8 2,097 0 4
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6 2010 53–22 70.7% #5 2,121 0 6
26 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7 2011 34–9 79.1% #13 2,127 0 10
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15 — — — — — — —
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15 — — — — — — —
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Soderling
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2004 17 15 32 53.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
20 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
21 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 19 11 30 63.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 10 6 16 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 25 13 38 65.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
24 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
25 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 35 15 50 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
26 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 19 3 22 86.4% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — 167 96 263 63.5% 71 49 120 59.2% 26 17 43 60.5% 21 6 27 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's and 448/453 of Robin Soderling's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Soderling
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6% 2001 2/2 9.5 2.5 52.3% 71.3% 58.2% 71.4% 35.7% 65.0% 36.7%
17 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6% 2002 6/6 4.8 4.3 58.0% 66.6% 41.7% 46.1% 39.1% 55.9% 35.7%
18 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7% 2003 16/16 8.3 3.6 63.7% 75.0% 52.8% 51.7% 47.9% 66.8% 37.6%
19 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6% 2004 57/58 7.0 2.7 61.3% 73.0% 51.4% 58.5% 46.7% 64.6% 36.9%
20 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2% 2005 34/34 9.2 3.9 60.0% 73.1% 48.6% 68.0% 44.5% 63.4% 36.0%
21 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6% 2006 55/55 6.7 2.9 63.4% 75.9% 53.4% 67.2% 42.2% 67.7% 38.7%
22 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7% 2007 37/37 7.4 2.6 62.3% 74.9% 51.0% 56.6% 46.1% 65.9% 40.1%
23 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1% 2008 59/60 10.5 2.8 61.8% 79.9% 55.0% 70.2% 44.2% 70.4% 37.9%
24 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8% 2009 64/67 8.9 2.8 59.7% 78.3% 56.0% 64.4% 46.8% 69.2% 39.0%
25 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9% 2010 75/75 9.9 3.3 59.2% 78.3% 52.6% 66.0% 45.1% 67.7% 39.4%
26 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1% 2011 43/43 8.0 2.7 62.9% 76.0% 54.4% 56.9% 46.3% 67.9% 40.3%
27 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1% — 448/453 8.5 3.0 61.2% 76.3% 53.0% 63.3% 45.2% 67.2% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Gasquet Robin Soderling
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22 2001 1519 112.1 +0.27 +0.13 1.047 50.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.15
17 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06 2002 1554 115.3 -3.43 -0.70 0.809 46.1% +62 -67 — 31.3% -1.25 0–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.09
18 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) — +0.35 2003 1729 131.0 +1.72 +1.37 1.132 52.0% -13 — -32 57.1% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.25
19 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.52 2004 1820 148.4 +1.68 +0.70 1.041 50.8% +14 -282 -138 53.4% +0.31 9–12 (43%) 16–13 (55%) — -3.53
20 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.51 2005 1738 135.0 +0.73 -0.84 0.986 49.9% +56 -187 -96 49.4% +0.06 5–4 (56%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.02
21 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.61 2006 1823 152.2 +4.87 +2.04 1.200 52.9% 0 -152 -111 59.2% +0.64 8–10 (44%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.90
22 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.90 2007 1832 149.5 +2.84 +2.66 1.176 52.9% +14 -116 -76 60.2% +0.80 8–8 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.51
23 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.85 2008 1948 162.9 +6.87 +1.96 1.279 53.7% +29 -144 -139 62.9% +1.10 11–6 (65%) 8–17 (32%) — -3.43
24 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) — 0.00 2009 2098 167.1 +5.93 +3.27 1.268 53.8% -49 -40 -206 63.7% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.00
25 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.44 2010 2122 171.5 +4.91 +4.01 1.222 53.4% -9 +7 -147 65.3% +1.12 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.54
26 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.77 2011 2128 166.5 +4.27 +3.85 1.257 53.8% +23 +78 -111 71.2% +1.27 8–1 (89%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.37
27 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) — +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) — +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) — -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22 — 2175 163.7 +4.10 +2.30 1.175 52.7% +5 -76 -120 60.7% +0.79 72–60 (55%) 96–105 (48%) 99.2 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.