H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Simone Bolelli H2H: 6-0

Richard Gasquet holds a 6–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–0 on grass and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2015 Queen's Club third round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2015* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #19 6-1 6-2 Simone Bolelli #55 Match data
Jan 8, 2015* Doha ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #26 6-3 6-2 Simone Bolelli #52 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #13 6-3 6-2 6-4 Simone Bolelli #116 Match data
Feb 27, 2009* Dubai ATP 500 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #26 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) Simone Bolelli #36 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Richard Gasquet #10 6-3 6-3 Simone Bolelli #47 Match data
Feb 14, 2008* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #7 6-3 6-3 Simone Bolelli #65 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,920 114 156 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Simone Bolelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,602 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2008 26–27 49.1% #41 1,785 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,694 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,675 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,743 0 0
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,865 0 0
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,770 0 0
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,792 0 0
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,783 0 0
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,734 0 0
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 — — — — — — —
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 2025 1–0 100.0% — 1,741 0 0