H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Steve Johnson H2H: 3-1

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–1 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Gasquet leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2022 Winston-Salem fourth round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Steve Johnson
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2022* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Gasquet #91 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 Steve Johnson #115 Match data
Nov 3, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #19 6-4 7-6(11) Steve Johnson #33 Match data
Jun 16, 2016* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Steve Johnson #39 7-6(2) 6-2 Richard Gasquet #10 Match data
Sep 2, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #318 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 Steve Johnson #245 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Steve Johnson #1,015 #21 1,680 1,981 196 201 49.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Steve Johnson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2010 0–1 0.0% #636 1,529 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2011 0–2 0.0% #372 1,522 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2012 3–5 37.5% #175 1,574 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2013 4–10 28.6% #156 1,667 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2014 20–20 50.0% #37 1,754 0 0
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2015 37–27 57.8% #32 1,957 0 0
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2016 27–27 50.0% #33 1,880 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2017 29–23 55.8% #44 1,863 0 2
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2018 27–22 55.1% #33 1,833 0 4
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2019 14–21 40.0% #85 1,735 0 4
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2020 6–8 42.9% #72 1,722 0 4
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2021 10–12 45.5% #85 1,704 0 4
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2022 17–17 50.0% #110 1,697 0 4
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2023 2–5 28.6% #241 1,575 0 4
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2024 0–1 0.0% #1017 1,568 0 4
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —