H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Tommy Haas H2H: 1-2

Tommy Haas holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2012 Roland Garros third round 6-7(3) 6-3 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 2012* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #318 6-7(3) 6-3 6-0 6-0 Tommy Haas #112 Match data
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Haas #39 6-7(3) 6-4 5-7 7-5 6-2 Richard Gasquet #12 Match data
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tommy Haas #41 6-2 7-5 6-2 Richard Gasquet #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15