H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 2-3

Tommy Robredo holds a 3–2 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Robredo leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2014 Australian Open third round 2-6 7-5 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Robredo #18 2-6 7-5 6-4 7-6(6) Richard Gasquet #9 Match data
Sep 25, 2010* Metz ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Gasquet #30 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Tommy Robredo #40 Match data
Jan 23, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Robredo #6 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-4 Richard Gasquet #17 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Robredo #7 7-5 7-5 Richard Gasquet #27 Match data
Jul 15, 2004* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #130 6-1 6-4 Tommy Robredo #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,048 523 351 59.8% 0 1 0 0 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,794 0 1
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,761 0 1
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2004 39–24 61.9% #13 1,823 0 2
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,849 0 2
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,868 0 4
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2008 35–22 61.4% #21 1,882 0 7
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,903 0 9
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,760 0 10
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,752 0 10
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,000 0 12
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,998 0 12
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,883 0 12
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,814 0 12
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,582 0 12
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12