H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Richard Gasquet vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 3-2

Richard Gasquet holds a 3–2 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2017 Rotterdam third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 2017* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #19 6-4 6-2 Viktor Troicki #38 Match data
Feb 14, 2013* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Richard Gasquet #10 7-6(3) 6-1 Viktor Troicki #40 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Gasquet #18 7-5 6-3 Viktor Troicki #30 Match data
Jan 15, 2011* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Viktor Troicki #30 6-4 6-4 Richard Gasquet #29 Match data
Nov 6, 2010* Basel ATP 500 QF Hard Viktor Troicki #32 6-4 6-2 Richard Gasquet #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,165 596 406 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,008 268 256 51.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Gasquet Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,922 0 4 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,920 0 5 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,869 0 5 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,786 0 0
23 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,855 0 5 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,803 0 0
24 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,892 0 6 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,935 0 1
25 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,984 0 6 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2012 41–21 66.1% #10 2,002 0 7 2012 21–26 44.7% #38 1,769 0 1
27 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10 2013 16–17 48.5% #75 1,823 0 1
28 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,935 0 10 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,127 0 12 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,844 0 2
30 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,998 0 14 2016 33–27 55.0% #29 1,895 0 3
31 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,933 0 15 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,647 0 3
33 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,844 0 15 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,635 0 3
34 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,823 0 15 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,634 0 3
35 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,772 0 15 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,643 0 3
36 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,860 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,628 0 16 — — — — — — —
38 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,620 0 16 — — — — — — —
39 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,636 0 16 — — — — — — —