H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 0-1
Andrew Ilie holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrew Ilie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrew Ilie won the 1995 Roland Garros second round 3-6 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Andrew Ilie | 3-6 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Andrew Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |